forum interseksi

selabintana
Forum Interseksi was initially an internal program of the Japan Foundation Jakarta Office where Hikmat Budiman, cofounder and is currently the chairman of the Interseksi foundation, had worked with for five years. Assigned as a program coordinator of the intellectual exchange division of the foundation, in the year 2000 he designed a program to facilitate discussions amongst young Indonesian intellectuals and activists on current political issues resulted from political turmoils in Indonesia during the period of post "reformasi" movement. He proposed the program to the former director general of the foundation, and later was noticed that his proposal could only be realized in the next following Japanese fiscal year.

Based on the proposal, in the fiscal year of 2001, the foundation initiated a forum later to be named “ Forum Interseksi” for young intellectual in the region of Jakarta, Bandung, Bogor, Depok, and Yogyakarta to critically and freely discuss the current issues they have been faced with. The main objective of the discussion was to encourage young activists and/or intellectuals to share ideas to each other and to build critical understanding of social, cultural and political phenomena recently occurred after the downfall of Soeharto’s New Order Regime back in 1998.




DATES/VENUE ORGANIZER(S) TOPICS
10/30/2001
The Japan Foundation, Jakarta
 The Japan Foundation, Jakarta Indonesian CSOs After Wahid Era
01/15-17/2002
Hotel Panorama, Bandung		 The Japan Foundation and Desantara, Institute for Cultural Studies Communalism and the Future of Democracy in Indonesia
03/19/2002
The Japan Foundation, Jakarta		 The Japan Foundation, Jakarta Regional Autonomy, Regional Justice
08/12-14/2002
Hotel Selabintana, Sukabumi		 Forum Interseksi and The Japan Foundation, Jakarta Civil Rights: Conceptual Discourses and Indonesian Experience
01/27-29/2003
Hotel Grage Sangkan Hurip, Kuningan		 Forum Interseksi and The Japan Foundation, Jakarta Civil Rights (Part II)
06/7-9/2007
Perkumpulan Pergerakan Office, Bandung		 The Interseksi Foundation, Perkumpulan Pergerakan, and Perkumpulan Inisiatif, Bandung State, Market, and Intellectual
06/15-17/2007Pusad Yogyakarta The Interseksi Foundation, Perkumpulan Inisiatif, Perkumpulan Pergerakan, Perkumpulan Lafadl The Post-New Order Youth in Indonesia


kuningan
The first discussion, convened in the Japan Foundation Jakarta office building, tried to elaborate the political stance and ideological position of Indonesian civil society organizations after the demise of Abdurrahman Wahid’s power. This issue is politically critical in that while Wahid has long been known as one of the prominent figures actively involved in the prodemocratic movements during Soeharto’s tenure, along with the coming of Megawati to power many people doubt if she has as a strong commitment toward democratization as people tend to believe Wahid does.

Attended by 15 selected participants, the discussion was conducted by Hikmat Budiman as the program coordinator of the intellectual exchange division of the Japan Foundation at that time. The forum went on discussing not only the political and ideological stance Indonesian CSOs should side with, but also on how to regain one of the fundamental aspect of democratization, the public sphere, which had long been coopted by the State through its autoritarian government.

One of the participants, Philips Jusario Vermonte, coined the term "interseksi" (intersection) to describe the intersection of interests and concerns shared together amongs civil society organizations, the state, and business sectors. Some other parctipants proposed to utlize the concept as an alternative to the mainstream perspective in which CSOs has always been seen as opposition forces against the state. According to the forum, that's not always the case anymore as we are now living in a radically new political situation. While that's by no means throwing away the idea of opposition against the state all together, the formation of civil society organizations should rather be based on cooperation with other elements of society, not opposing to each other. The forum agreed that we have to leave the notion that for the CSOs to win the state has to lose.
hiking

At the end of the first discussion, all participants were asked to give suggestion on what kind of forum they actually want to participate in, what specialty could make a different with other existing forum, who they recommend to be the participants for the next discussion, what topics to be elaborate in the next discussion, and who is the speaker they considered competent for the topic they agreed on to discuss.


THE FIRST MEETING
Date : October 30, 2001
Venue : The Japan Foundation Office, Jakarta

General Theme: Indonesian CSOs After Abdurrahman Wahid Era

Speakers and themes:


List of Participants

All participants were very eager to have the next discussion inviting more participants from many different backgrounds,Participants agreed to have the next meeting in Bandung to elaborate the issues on humanalism and the prospect of democracy. Participant from DESANTARA Institute for Cultural Studies was interested in coorganizing the next discussion


THE SECOND MEETING
Coorganized with DESANTARA, Institute for Cultural Studies
Date : January 15th –17th , 2002
Venue : Hotel Panorama Bandung, West Jawa
General Theme: Communalism and The Future of Indonesia Democracy

Speaker and theme

    Paper Title: Bangsa yang Tidak Sempat Dewasa, Memahami Radikalisme, Otonomi Daerah, dan Demokrasi Paska Orde Baru (An Infantile Nation, Understanding Radicalism, Regional Autonomy, dan Democracy After Indonesia’s New Order)



    List of Participants



    Overal, the forum was excellent, and intellectually challenging, participants were very active, and the topic was heatedly discussed until midnight. Most of the participants had written a 2-3 page paper addressing the topic they have been interested in and related to the general theme. To all participants were given 15-20 minutes for presentation. After participants’presentation, they were enjoined to further elaborate the general theme of the discussion. All participants agreed to give the forum a name, Interseksi (Intersection). Participants were asked to revise their paper to incorporate ideas they developed during the discussion in the hope that they could publish the results of the discussion as a book. For the next discussion (slated to be held in March 2002) participants decided to further discuss the issues on regional autonomy and its political and social consequencies to the people in the region and to the process of democratization.


    THE THIRD MEETING
    March 19, 2002
    Venue: The Japan Foundation Jakarta Office

    General Theme: Regional Autonomy, Regional Justice

    Speakers and themes


    List of Participants

    Despite only few participants attended the meeting, the discussion was still very interesting
    Considering how hard it had been for the participants to write the 2-3 page paper for each discussion they had partipated in, they then set up a team of 5 participants to write a detailed guide lines for the next following meetings

    THE FOURTH MEETING
    Date, Venue: on August 12-14, at Selabintana Hotel, Sukabumi, West Java.

    List of Participants

    THE FIFTH MEETING
    Date, Venue: January 27-29, Hotel Grage Sangkan Hurip, Kuningan West Java.

    Started in the fourth round of its Discussion Series INTERSEKSI decided to not inviting well known speakers, and instead teamed up two working-groups, each consist of two and three members respectively, to prepare working papers to be presented in the forum. The two working groups were assigned to conduct small researches on the subject of civil rights with different focuses. The focus of the first working group was on the basic ideas (conceptual discourses) of the civil rights developed in Western (and Islam) intellectual tradition, while the second group was focused on Indonesian experience regarding the implementation of and the search for particular (local) concept of the civil rights. While the first group was based on literature study, the other one came up with a report based on field research. It is worth noting that, based on the two working papers, although conceptually the idea of the civil right is rather easier to define as something rooted in the liberal political tradition in the west, it has been quite problematic when the concept meets realities in Indonesia. Unfortunately, a member of the first working group who had been assigned to make a literature investigation on what the Islamic concept of civil rights is and in what way such ideas do contribute to the civil rights discourses in Indonesia could not come to the forum.

    All participants were also asked to write a 3-page paper related to the general theme of the discussion. To them was given about 20 minutes to make a presentation. The absence of senior speakers had indeed made the discussion more dynamic. The presentations made by the two working-group are very good and all participants were vividly debating the subject until late of night. Although, for some reasons, some former participants could not participate in this forum, INTERSEKSI had managed to have some new participants who were as good as or better than the former. To my experience, this is the best forum that INTERSEKSI has ever had. At the end of the forum INTERSEKSI appointed again three different working groups to prepare working papers for the next discussion scheduled to be convened in January 2003.

    In January 2003 Interseksi had been able to organized its fifth round discussion series, and invite more participants from such richer backgrounds as feminist organizations, and Forum Rektor, a trans-campus organization which was established to critically monitoring the general election and the politics of contemporary Indonesia. Still in this forum Interseksi kept its previous decision not to invite senior speakers. Instead of spending two to four hour listening presentation by “intellectual celebrities” from Jakarta, they spend all the time available to make their own presentation.

    Furthering their discussion on the subject of the Civil Rights, some former participants either tried to improve their paper presentations or change their topic altogether, while the new participants had made their best to enrich the forum by presenting their own perspectives on the subject. New to the discussion was the feminist or gender-based perspective elaboration on the subject of civil rights where women had always been neglected in the discourse and, as a consequence, had always been victimized.

    The fifth round meeting was also managed to give more time to discuss issues and concept of civil rights in the area of islamic studies. Two participants from Islamic State University, Jakarta (formerly known as State Institute of Islamic Studies, IAIN) delivered the presentation on the subject and had vividly generated challenging debate amongst participants. Another topic heatedly debated was the controversies about civil disobidience. Some argued that civil disobideince is in itlsef a part of civil rights hence must be incorporated in to the state constitution. On the other hand, while considering civil disobidience a part of civil rights, other participants convincingly arguing that this kind of civil rights need not be incorporated in to the state constitution as this will only reduce the essence of the concept of civil disobedience.

    The end of the meeting was focused on discussing the future of forum Interseksi. They agreed to, in the future, make Interseksi less dependent of the Japan Foundation’s initiatif.


    List of Participants



    BOOK PUBLISHING AND LAUNCHING PARTY
    In March 2003 Interseksi published its first book edited colaboratively by Hikmat Budiman (the Program Coordinator in Charge of Intellectual Exchange division of the Japan Foundation Jakarta office) and Landry H. Subianto (researcher from CSIS and one of Interseksi’s member). The title of the book is Komunalisme & Demokrasi, Negosiasi Rakyat dan Negara (Communalism and Democracy, Negotiation Between People and the State), and is based on rewritten version of the individual papers participants had presented in the second meeting in January 2002. It comprises of 9 (nine) essays written by the partcipants with one postscript essays written by Hikmat Budiman.

    On March 31 Interseksi and the Japan Foundation Jakarta office is jointly convening book launching and discussion inviting three speakers: one from Interseksi, and the other two from other institutions.


    ŠTHE INTERSEKSI FOUNDATION 2007. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DEVELOPED BY "n + k" graphics